Maths Isn't a Talent — It's a Skill You Can Build
The 'maths brain' myth is holding students back.
Academiq Maestro Learning Team
·Jul 21, 2026
·5 min read
How many times have you heard someone say 'I'm just not a maths person'? Maybe you've said it yourself. Here's what the research actually says: there is no such thing as a fixed maths brain. Mathematical ability is a skill — and like every skill, it improves with the right practice and the right support.
Where the myth comes from — and why it's wrong
Carol Dweck's decades of research at Stanford — summarised clearly in her work on growth mindset — shows that students who believe their intelligence is fixed consistently underperform compared to those who believe ability can be developed. Crucially, a 2024 study (Mohamoud, 2024) found a strong positive relationship between growth mindset and academic performance across subjects, with students who adopted a growth mindset showing better problem-solving, more effective study strategies and greater resilience.
The gap-filling problem in maths
Maths is cumulative. A 2025 study in the International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (Springer) found that targeted retrieval practice in maths courses helped first-year students with weak prior knowledge catch up significantly over time — narrowing the achievement gap in specific content areas. Students who had missed foundational concepts benefited most from structured, regular practice with immediate feedback. A good tutor identifies and fills those specific gaps rather than just covering this week's syllabus.
Practice with feedback, not just repetition
Doing 50 practice questions incorrectly doesn't help — it reinforces the wrong method. Research by Wisniewski, Zierer and Hattie (2020), based on a meta-analysis of 435 studies, confirmed that feedback has a medium-to-large effect (d = 0.48) on student learning — but only when it's specific and actionable. Our AI question generator tells you where you went wrong and why, so every question is a genuine learning opportunity rather than just a test.
View underlying data
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| Before intervention | 40% |
| After 1 term | 56% |
| After 2 terms | 70% |
| After 3 terms | 80% |
Research sources
Written by
Academiq Maestro Learning Team
Our learning specialists translate cognitive-science research into practical revision strategies students can actually use.